Published Monday, 26 November 2012
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.
Are you in Northern Ireland?
1. Why is my postcode required?
We are asking you to insert your postcode before watching some videos to confirm
you can access the video content via u.tv.
This is because some videos on u.tv
are only available in Northern Ireland.
Don't worry, we won't store or use this information for any other purpose.
If you are not in Northern Ireland, the content may be available to watch at itv.com or stv.tv.
2. Why am I directed to itv.com
or stv.tv when I try to view certain
The videos, which are not available on u.tv
to users outside Northern Ireland, will be available to those users on itv.com (for users in England and Wales) or stv.tv (for most users in Scotland).
We need to know where you are in order to make sure you are getting the right content.
If you think we've got your location wrong, then please
Need more help? Contact us
Tweed, who played for Ireland and Ulster, stands accused of abusing two young girls who are now adults over an eight-year period.
The Ballymena councillor has denied all 14 counts of indecent assault, gross indecency and inciting gross indecency during his three-week trial at Antrim Crown Court.
The jury was told on Monday to set aside any sympathy for those who claim to be victims and prejudice against those accused of sexual offences.
In his summary, Judge Alistair Devlin said: "You must clear your minds of sympathy - put aside sympathy for people who claim to be victims of child sex abuse. You must also put aside any prejudices which you may have for someone accused of sexual offences."
He added that the 10 women and two men of the jury must take a rational and logical approach to their deliberations.
"If there is a real possibility that he is not guilty, then you must give him the benefit of the doubt and find him not guilty," Judge Devlin continued.
"You should approach the issue of a true verdict with an open mind."
The court was told that Tweed had no obligation to explain why there were so many complaints against him.
Jurors were also warned that while there was no evidence of collusion between the two complainants, they should bear in mind the risk of contamination.
They were told they will be under no time pressure to reach a verdict once they retire.