UK warning over Korea nuclear threat

Published Thursday, 04 April 2013
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

Prime Minister David Cameron has issued a stark warning against any move to abandon the UK's nuclear deterrent, amid the escalating threat from North Korea - whose military is said to have been cleared to attack the US using nuclear weapons.

UK warning over Korea nuclear threat
Soldiers from the US Army 23rd Chemical Battalion, wearing anti-chemical suits. (© PA)

While analysts do not expect an actual strike by North Korea, which could trigger a suicidal war, a series of intense threats continue to be issued by the country.

"The highly unpredictable and aggressive regime in North Korea recently conducted its third nuclear test and could already have enough fissile material to produce more than a dozen nuclear weapons," David Cameron said, writing for the Daily Telegraph.

"Last year, North Korea unveiled a long-range ballistic missile which it claims can reach the whole of the United States."

If this became a reality, it would also affect the whole of Europe - including the UK.

Prime Minister David Cameron

A spokesman for the Korean People's Army has formally informed the White House and Pentagon that the "ever-escalating hostile policy and reckless nuclear threat" of the US would be "smashed".

The statement added that "cutting-edge smaller, lighter and diversified nuclear strike means" would be used.

According to South Korea, their neighbours have moved a missile with "considerable range" to the east coast - but Defence Minister Kim Kwan-jin dismissed reports that the missile could be a KN-08.

That type of long-range missile, if operable, could hit the US.

The Pentagon has taken the decision to deploy a missile defence system to the US Pacific territory of Guam to strengthen protection against a possible strike.

US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel says Washington is doing all it can to defuse the situation.

"Some of the actions they've taken over the last few weeks present a real and clear danger and threat to the interests, certainly of our allies, starting with South Korea and Japan," he said.

The US had better ponder over the prevailing grave situation.

Korean People's Army

Meanwhile, Mr Cameron insists that while the world has changed dramatically, the need for the UK's nuclear deterrent remains.

"The Soviet Union no longer exists. But the nuclear threat has not gone away," he said.

"In terms of uncertainty and potential risk it has, if anything, increased."

The prime minister also expressed concerns over Iran continuing to defy the will of the international community over its nuclear programme.

"Does anyone seriously argue that it would be wise for Britain, faced with this evolving threat today, to surrender our deterrent?" Mr Cameron said.

"Only the retention of our independent deterrent makes clear to any adversary that the devastating cost of an attack on the UK or its allies will always be far greater than anything it might hope to gain."

The Conservatives are committed to replacing the ageing Trident submarine fleet with like-for-like models, but their Liberal Democrat coalition partners are seeking a cheaper alternative.

Labour say retention of an independent nuclear deterrent is "absolutely right", but that the costs involved must be taken into account.

The future of Trident is likely to feature in next year's Scottish independence referendum campaign, with the SNP insisting it would not allow nuclear missiles to be based in an independent Scotland.

© UTV News
Comments Comments
11 Comments
James in Manchester wrote (596 days ago):
America did not want any involvement or anything to do with the Falklands war Tommy. We should never have went onto the streets of Ireland never mind the Americans. Stupid statement.
Mark in Belfast wrote (599 days ago):
Britain = war- destroy-rob-rape-steal. History explains.
Tommy Atkins in London, England wrote (599 days ago):
Mike you are totally wrong about the USA and the Falklands and not being involved. First the Falkland war was an internal British problem/ Second the Korean war was totally backed by the U.N . Hence the number of UN members countries who fought in Korea belonged tothe U.N. IT was NOT an American war. And BTW the Korean war has officially never ended!!!In the Falklans The USA DID NOT stay neautra in the Palkland. but gave Britain intelligence gained from their many USA, AWACS which the Americans put into action before the Falkland invasion and flew around the clock during the mission.. Perhaps you also think that the USA should have been on the streets of N Ireland.
Mike in London wrote (601 days ago):
Britain is a lap dog to the Americans. We need to stay out of it. The Americans stayed neutral when the Falklands war happened. England is broke right now. We are in so much debt. The english taxpayer cannot afford another war.
CrumlinT in Co Antrim wrote (601 days ago):
Lol in Carrickfergus. There are many British people who do not agree with British Foreign Policy. Are you not embarrassed by labelling your fellow subject a republican extremist? You have shown yourself to be an insular and paranoiac unionist. On another note, these scare tactics by the US and British Governments are a regular ploy to secure support for aggressive action. WOMD springs to mind.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
Flash flooding
Thu 13 November 2014
I
Wed 12 November 2014
The X Factor Live: Week 4
Sat 01 November 2014