Tough penalties pledge on animal cruelty

Published Tuesday, 25 September 2012
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

Agriculture Minister Michelle O'Neill has pledged her support for the full use of tougher penalties for animal welfare abuses.

Tough penalties pledge on animal cruelty
Cody was put down as a result of the burn injuries she received. (© UTV)

Highlighting the introduction of stiffer pledges under the Welfare of Animals Act 2011, the Sinn Féin Minister said she was "totally committed to protecting and safeguarding animal welfare."

Anyone found guilty of such offences now faces two years in prison and/or an unlimited fine. The court can also disqualify any person convicted of an animal welfare offence from keeping an animal.

In the past, those convicted faced 3 months' imprisonment and/or a £5,000 fine.

The Minister's statement came as a result of a debate at Stormont on Monday which was attended by the owners of a pet dog put to sleep following an act of cruelty that stunned the public.

Cody the collie was covered in flammable liquid and set on fire close to her family home in Maghaberry, Co Antrim last month.

Despite efforts to try and save her - Cody lost her fight for life.

She was put down because the burns to her skin were too severe.

Minister O'Neill said: "I believe that the new tough penalties introduced by the 2011 Act will be a strong deterrent to thugs who would carry out such barbaric welfare abuses as the recent Cody case.

"I support the full use of the extended sentences available for serious animal welfare offences to include longer periods of imprisonment to ensure that perpetrators receive a punishment that fits the crime.

"I intend to meet the Minister of Justice to ensure that the Courts are encouraged to make full use of the range of penalties available for animal welfare offences and in horrific cases like the Cody case to apply the maximum penalties possible."

The shocking episode of cruelty has resulted in fresh calls for tougher sentences.

The DUP want greater prison sentences made available to the judiciary.

Paul Givan MLA, Chair of the Justice Committee, told UTV: "If somebody can attack a defenceless animal like this then we have a concern - what could they do to a human being?"

Ms O'Neill highlighted a recent successful prosecution under the 2011 act.

"I am pleased to note that in one of the first cases the PSNI has recently secured a successful prosecution at Downpatrick Magistrates' Court where a defendant was found guilty of causing unnecessary suffering to a dog under the 2011 Act. The defendant was fined £250 and prohibited from keeping animals for five years."

The minister concluded: "The public should be in no doubt that causing unnecessary suffering, including deliberate acts of cruelty to domestic pets, will not be tolerated and that the perpetrators will be punished."

Animal welfare charity, the USPCA, has welcomed the Stormont debate.

David Wilson, of the charity, said: "It's 30 years of Cinderella for animal welfare legislation. 2011 saw the new Animal welfare act. 2012 has saw full implementation. We welcome any moves to increase penalties."

Cody's case is not isolated. A litter of kittens was saved from a group of boys in Londonderry earlier this month, who were trying to set the animals on fire.

It is believed some of the children involved in the incident were as young as nine years old.

Mr Wilson says an increase in penalties in itself is not the answer - but increased enforcement is also needed.

"By increasing penalties [it] doesn't actually improve the situation unless we have adequate and proper enforcement."

He said the USPCA attended a meeting recently with their counterparts in Europe and the Commission where the issue of enforcement is being pressed.

EXTERNAL LINKS / CONTACTS
"That would be our message - better enforcement."
© UTV News
Comments Comments
6 Comments
Christine Barrington in Sheffield wrote (565 days ago):
So pleased that something is being done to try and help support these poor animals who cannot stand up for themselves.
Barbara A Steward in Northumberland wrote (721 days ago):
It breaks my heart looking at Cody and the thugs that hurt her must be severely punished to deter others from committing such cruelty. Has the case been heard yet?
Ryan in Belfast wrote (721 days ago):
Great News! glad to hear that tougher punishment is in place for those who commit cruelty to animals. Now, lets ensure that the law is upheld and the process is carried out to the full.
Lee-Ann in Glenavy wrote (721 days ago):
Great news, now lets just hope the courts will enforce tougher penalties, although I do believe a name and shame would also work as normal decent human beings would not want to have anything to do with anyone who could be so cruel just for kicks and they would suffer isolation within their own communities which would definitely prevent anyone else from carrying out such a dreadful act that i am sure broke the hearts of that entire family and anyone who saw the pictures of the unnecessary suffering of poor Cody RIP at Rainbow Bridge.
Iain in Belfast wrote (721 days ago):
Talk is cheap and if a £250 fine is considered "successful" then we have a long, long way to go to put a stop to this sickening display of cruelty.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
Ian Paisley in pictures
Fri 12 September 2014
Tributes to Gerry Anderson
Thu 21 August 2014
Frampton crowned world champion
Sun 07 September 2014