Social worker wins abuse case

Published Wednesday, 25 January 2012
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

An award-winning social worker has won a long-running sectarian harrassment legal case taken against the Belfast Heath Trust.

Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Sectarian abuse
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Harassment discussion

Castlewellan woman Laurena Kane, 43, suffered years of abuse while working at Northern Ireland's biggest health trust.

Ms Kane won the four year legal battle with a judge at the High Court awarding her damages in excess of £20,000 after her employers admitted liability in relation to her being the victim of religious and sectarian harassment.

The abuse began in 2004 when she was the only catholic member of the Early Years team of social workers based at Knockbracken Healthcare Centre outside Belfast.

The verbal abuse included comments such as:

"I hate Catholics."

"Since those Catholics moved in there's an awful smell coming over the hedge."

"I bet you call him some Taigy name like Freedom."

Ms Kane said she had suffered in silence at the beginning.

She said: "I had great support from my family but I felt (at the beginning) I could not take it to my line manager because my line manager was present when the sectarian comments were being made and took no action to curtail them.

"It was not a nice environment at all. It was very difficult.

"It came to a head when a comment was made in the presence of two senior managers and I felt I could not take this humiliation with my team.

"I was very upset, I became ill, and mentally and physically affected," she said.

Ms Kane developed a depressive illness as a result of the intimidation and initiated legal action in 2008 because she was unhappy with how her employers had handled her complaint.

She lost her hair, suffering from the stress-related condition Alopecia.

A psychiatric evaluation in 2010 found that the illness was a direct result of her being subject to harassment at work.

Speaking on Wednesday after the end of the case, she said she knew she had to stand up.

"I know that I did the right thing and I have no regrets.

"I know this is potentially happening to other people and I think it takes someone to stand up against it and speak out about it," she said.

In a statement, Belfast Trust said that all allegations of sectarianism are taken very seriously.

The Trust said: "In this instance, we initiated a high level investigation and took appropriate disciplinary and other action against individuals who behaved in a totally unacceptable way. The issue of liability was part of the legal process."

© UTV News
Comments Comments
29 Comments
Emma in Dromara wrote (90 days ago):
gOOD WORK, aUNTIE l. kNEW YOU COULD DO IT.
John in Belfast wrote (110 days ago):
The trust is a joke,to many chiefs,bullying is riddled throughout, the brave people than come forward in these cases are usually deemed a problem and the infiltraters get a wee rap on the knuckles and told to be careful. I hope Ms Kane has inspired others to come forward WELL DONE
Henry in Bangor wrote (118 days ago):
I notice the Belfast Trust did not came forward to offer Ms Kane an apology? The Belfast Trust really ought to have publicly condemned this offensive behaviour! What does this not say about the Belfast Trust! This raises concerns to me.
Anthony in Ireland wrote (118 days ago):
I agree with Jenny’s comment, ‘there are two sides to every story’; however, there is also a 3rd side – the Truth. Thankfully, when living in a Democracy or working within the Public Sector, Internal Investigations and Courts are used to establish the Truth, or in other words, ‘facts’. It seems the Belfast Trust needed 4 years to ensure these ‘facts’ were established and accurate before they would concede liability. Surely, this lengthy legal investigation was deemed necessary to reassure everyone that the facts were now established? I suppose High Court Judges tend to be fussy about ‘facts’ based on substance such as eye witness statements etc before they give these types of cases the time of day. I wonder if those innocent people Jenny refers to who lost their jobs over this, exercised their right to raise the grievances they felt for their dismissal? I also wonder in what context Social Workers referencing to the smell of Catholics is ok? What advice would Jenny give to people subjected to these types of comments in the workplace? Considering she seems to know the context in which these comments were made, I would be keen to learn what she thinks is the best way to deal with scenarios like this? Social Workers are paid to ensure equality and welfare for all; one must strive for higher standards Jenny.
stevie in belfast wrote (119 days ago):
@ Billy. This is about a Catholic worker getting sectarian abuse in the work place. Why do you constantly try to deflect from the topic? Just condemn it without the whataboutery.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES