SF bid to delay welfare reform

Published Friday, 05 October 2012
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

Sinn Féin will try to delay welfare reform measures being considered by the Assembly next week.

SF bid to delay welfare reform
A personal independence payment reassessed every three years could replace DLA. (© Getty)

Key reform features include a universal credit to cover a range of benefits, housing benefit reforms and a personal independence payment reassessed every three years to replace Disability Living Allowance.

But Sinn Féin MLA Alex Maskey is arguing that the Welfare Bill is flawed and targeted at the most vulnerable and disadvantaged in society.

He linked it to "austerity policies" of the Conservative-led coalition at Westminster.

Mr Maskey said: "It is our view that the Assembly has a duty to stand up for low-income families and those on benefit who are being directly targeted by many of these measures.

"The fact that these measures are being brought forward by the Tory Government and being imposed here is a direct consequence of the Assembly not having the necessary fiscal powers."

Next Tuesday, Sinn Féin will be bringing forward a proposal to the Assembly to defer the Welfare Reform Bill until significant amendments are made.

Mr Maskey added: "We will press for fundamental changes to this Bill to ensure the maximum protections for those on benefits and in low-paid employment."

The impact of Sinn Fein's intervention will depend on support from other parties.

Northern Ireland`s social welfare system is funded directly from Great Britain and costs more than the health service at £5.1 billion a year.

DUP Finance Minister Sammy Wilson MLA said it was a bombshell from Sinn Féin.
"Only last week Sinn Féin Ministers agreed that the Welfare Reform Bill could be brought to the Assembly. Indeed, they recognised that the timetable was tight."

He said that the consequences for delay of the Bill will be felt by welfare claimants, civil servants and public spending across all government departments.

"Sinn Fein took so long to agree this Bill at Executive level there is no slippage time at all available if the Bill is to clear the Assembly and be in place for April 2013," he continued.

"If it does not receive Royal Assent by April, then immediately 250,000 people who benefit each year from the Social Fund will find themselves with no means of support."

© UTV News
Comments Comments
6 Comments
steven in belfast wrote (224 days ago):
I watched the debate live on the internet and for SF to be interested they had only ten members in the chamber...Only ten,why?
ZZ in Belfast wrote (229 days ago):
SF have no right to try and stop this now!! They do not take there seats in parliament - so this is none of there concern!! If they were really seriously about this they would end this stupid belief of being absent from westminister and oppose this from there.. people in NI voted them into power, and the people who voted them into power equally have no right to oppose these as SF do-they voted for NO REPRESENTATION in westminister so it's their own fault. Atleast, the unionists, SDLP, alliance take their setas and try to oppose the cuts. I feel sorry for the people in these SF areas that didn't vote for them and don't get any representation. The sooner David Cameron does something about this the better!!
doirecormac in derry wrote (231 days ago):
Posturing, grand-standing and a feeble attempt to try and play the "We're the good guys" card. They didn't want people to know they were implementing the Tory cuts. We all know now so lets see where they go from here. There's no way they can bring the bill in now without being accused of doing a u-turn or having no principles - and we all know that couldn't be the case ....mmm
Jon in Belfast wrote (231 days ago):
This Bill is a nothing more than an attempt to demolish welfare provision across Britain and Northern Ireland. I will never vote Sinn Fein again if this Bill passes as it stands; and perhaps some of the working class Unionist community might think again about casting their votes for the DUP who are happy to usher in the end of social security. These people are not representing you. What next? The Health Service?
John in Armagh wrote (232 days ago):
This is just posteuring from Sein Fein, if they were serious about opposing the welfare reforms, they would have voted against it in parliament, oh yeah thats right their five MPs take the dosh but make no impact at Wesminister. Maybe they will give their parlimantary salaries and allowances to those that will suffer because of their delaying tactics.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
On the rocks
Wed 01 May 2013
4x4 in Ballycastle harbour
Thu 02 May 2013