UTV News - Defiant Robinson fights for career

Subscribe to the News Feed Newsback to News

Defiant Robinson fights for career

Text Size:  A  A |  POST A COMMENT |  PRINT |  SHARE 
The First Minister has called for a quick inquiry into the allegations made against him in a TV documentary as his political career hangs in the balance.
Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Full Interview: Peter Robinson
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Robinson affair unfolds
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Political Reaction
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Studio debate

Mr Robinson told UTV's Political Editor that he believed he would be exonerated, hitting out at the "despicable nature of those who provided the material for the programme."

The BBC documentary alleged the First Minister failed to alert the relevant authorities when his wife allegedly broke parliamentary rules to help her young lover set up his business.

The documentary revealed Iris Robinson secured £50,000 from two wealthy developers, who were family friends, so 19-year-old Kirk McCambley could open a restaurant on the banks of the River Lagan.

The Strangford MP faces allegations that she did not declare her financial interest in the business despite sitting on the local council which awarded the tender to her teenage lover in 2008.

"I think Iris does have questions to answer, but we must not breach her right to be able to do that," Peter Robinson said.

Selwyn Black, a former adviser to the MP who resigned after feeling uneasy about the loans issue and turned whistleblower to the investigation, claimed Mr Robinson became aware of the situation and in December 2008 urged his wife to ensure both loans were repaid to developers Ken Campbell and Fred Fraser, who had since died.

"The only information that I ever had in relations to these matters up to the time of the Spotlight programme was that my wife had facilitated a loan to be given to someone who started up a new enterprise from two business friends," Mr Robinson told UTV.

"That the cheques had been paid out directly to the new enterprise and that I insisted that the repayment be made in a manner which was proper through a solicitor and directly to those who had lent the money despite the fact that one of the lenders was deceased."

Inquiry

Peter Robinson vows to fight for his political life

Mr Robinson has now asked officials in the OFMDFM to look at the allegations and indicate whether the First Minister should have been responsible for disclosing the information to the Assembly or Westminster.

"I'm being tried in the court of public opinion. I'm being tried by the press and the media", he said.

"I believe it's necessary to speak to the public to let them know that I had done nothing wrong, that everything I've done, I've done in a perfectly proper way and I need to indicate that not only do I believe that but I'm putting it to the test."

Should the quick inquiry find that Mr Robinson failed in his responsibilities, "then that has clearly consequences for me and I'll have considerations to take into account."

"If it turns out there was no requirement to disclose I hope those same people who've been smearing will stand up and be man enough to say: 'We were wrong. He was right.'"

Mr Robinson also denied he left his wife unattended following her suicide attempt in March 2009.

"I stayed with her, I was by her side, I carried out the medical instructions that we had received. When Iris went to sleep I left her in the care of members of the family and attended my duties."

Mr Robinson insisted he has received thousands of emails and texts of support against the backdrop of what he called a smear campaign.

"If at any time the party feel that someone is better able to lead the party forward then as a party man I would stand aside", the DUP leader added.

At Stormont, doubts have been cast on his ability to focus 100% on his job as First Minister.

UUP leader Sir Reg Empey said Peter Robinson should now "seriously" consider his position.

"The prospect of a plethera of enquiries going on for months - distracting the First Minister and leaving Stormont in a powerless state cannot be contemplated. The Ulster Unionist Party therefore believes that Peter Robinson should give very serious consideration to his own position as First Minister," he said.

Earlier Sinn Fein Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness expressed his shock at the financial revelations made in the programme.

"I have sought an urgent meeting with the First Minister to discuss the implications for the Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister," he said.

TUV leader Jim Allister said both Iris and Peter Robinson's positions were "utterly untenable".

"I think he has undoubtedly lost the moral authority to govern and he should resign", Jim Allister told UTV.

"Fifty thousand pounds paid over from two developers... Is there not a course for investigation into what is the history and ease with which developers paid such money to a politician?" he asked.

The political storm comes as Sinn Fein and the DUP struggle to reach aggreement on the devolution of policing and justice.

Kirk McCambley, 21, leaves the Lock Keepers Inn, in south Belfast

© UTV News

Send to a friend

Email To
Your Name
Comment
Close
At 13:50 on 09 January 2010, Ricky wrote:
And I believed pantomime season had drawn to a close, not so it seems in the political spectre of Stormont. "Oh no she didn't, Oh, unfortunately,yes she did !" This lady, who in the past I publicly defended has been caught with a mighty stone in her hand, she stands high on the shoulders of hypocrisy when on one hand slamming the immorality of homosexuals whilst holding the other of a forty year her junior, toyboy lover. How can the public place trust in this woman when she can't even hold trust in her own household ? I feel the excuse of being ill is a very shallow veil, perhaps she should seek help from her psychiatrist friends now who may be able to fix her own immorality. Would it not have been a more plausible explaination to give to the electorate that she found herself in need, that she felt alone and isolated in the political world where her husband was so busy that there was a lack of attention being paid to her and that she fell for the companionship and lust of a much younger man who at the time was available to provide for those needs. But cover ups and excuses is instead what we are given, and I've no doubt that before this whole saga draws to a close, we will see much more. Peter on the other hand has a lot to answer for, I feel empathy for his marital situation and genuinely felt his hurt during the emotional interview he gave, however, empathy is not what runs the country and as elected First Minister he should have been much more transparent with the public over what has happened. Did he think that by saying nothing this would go away ? It's regrettable that the only reason we came to know about the misappropriation of funds and the cover ups of their double lives was because a television programme was going to spill the beans anyway. For such a "Godly man" to conceal the truth from the electorate for so long stinks of hypocrisy ! I fail to see how it could any longer be tenable for Peter to hold public office. For him to say the transparancy of the honesty regarding the republican commitment to the peace process is a valid reason to delay the devolution of policing and justice powers and at the same time be less than forthcoming with honesty himself shows a serious lack of integrity on behalf of a national leader, that is not what the populace needs to move our country forward. We need open, honest and transparent leadership. It is a sad enough thought that the public shell out £500,000 + per year to have kept the "Swish family Robinson" in their lavish lifestyles for so long but it would be nothing short of a travesty if we had to continue doing so. Stand down Peter, you've had your career in politics when those days of lies and burying the truth was overlooked by the electorate, those days are gone ! I think it's time you stepped back and looked at the damage your political life has caused, we're going nowhere as a country under your leadership, your wife obviously needs you more than the constituants in east Belfast and the damage this has done to your party will be mirrored when a sneering Jim Allister steps in to gloat over your misfortune and win seats for the TUV. Nows the time to go !
At 11:49 on 09 January 2010, lorna wrote:
Veronica. You comment about Martin McGuiness being hung out to dry if this were him is laughable . Have you not lived through the troubles and know not what Martin was capable of before he became such a great man..The very thought of him being first minister gives me the creeps.We have put these people in government and we are to blame.
At 11:20 on 09 January 2010, Tommy wrote:
Does he not see he has lost all credibilty now and even if he does stay how are we the poor peasants going to trust him again, is there no one in his party who sees this and has the courage to speak up. Speak up, practise what they preached for years and save face. Bin both them now without delay.
At 11:12 on 09 January 2010, Big Pete wrote:
Surely Peter knows he must join his wife on the dole queue. How could he possibly stay in post??
At 10:52 on 09 January 2010, Mark A Stott wrote:
Assuming this spectre only forces Iris out of politics, let alone that of Peter might go too. Veterans of the Belfast Agreement ‘cave-in to terrorism movement’- already soothsaying one or both the Robinsons should go - will, no doubt, be eagerly awaiting the return of their best hypocrisy suits, fresh from the cleaners. All ‘spick and span’ and ready to assure Sinn Fein (in particular) there is still a place in UK politics for those among them who have been convicted of terrorism offences, including murder! Oh! And (of course) a very hearty welcome still extends to those who have admitted in open court to formerly being Provisional IRA commander(s). Against accusers like these there can be no case against both Iris and Peter remaining in politics.
At 10:36 on 09 January 2010, D wrote:
Oh please, he must go! He didn't come out against her views on the gay community. And now she has proved to be a hypocrite, he is one too. Let's rid our society of bigotry and let's get people who respect each other to run our countries.
At 09:44 on 09 January 2010, Lyn wrote:
I agree with susan in some ways I can understand the backlash against iris but in some ways peter is a victim of his wides betrayel. He may lose his marriage and his career coz of what she has done, this is the easy way to push him out on the basis of his private life, I really hope he proves he never done anything wrong but I suspect people will still use this against him let him do his job
Post a comment
Name:
Email Address:
Location:
Your Comment:
Verification Code: Captcha Code  Get New Code
POST COMMENT
[Before posting, please take a moment to familiarise yourself with our house rules. All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Any information you enter, including email and web addresses, will be displayed on our site if passed by our moderators.]