Innocent man was killed by army

Published Thursday, 11 August 2011
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

A report into the killing of a Belfast man shot dead by British soldiers 40 years ago has found that he was innocent.

Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.

Billy McKavanagh, 21, was shot dead in the Markets area of Belfast on 11 August 1971.

The Historical Enquiries Team, which examined the circumstances surrounding the killing, said that he was shot in the back as he ran away when confronted by soldiers.

The soldier responsible maintains that the person he shot was armed.

At the time the British Army claimed the young catholic man was an IRA gunman.

However, the IRA said that neither he, nor his brother or cousin who were arrested after the shooting were members of the IRA.

The HET said Mr McKavanagh was not carrying the weapon, a rivet gun, which had been looted and left lying in the street and was picked up by members of his group.

Billy's death was an absolute tragedy that should not have happened.

HET report

"He was an innocent man who nothing more than pick up a pair of waders that had been stolen by someone else and then run away when confronted by the army."

Oliver Morris, brother-in-law of the victim, said the family is not looking for compensation.

"It's just an apology we want."

"I would be very disappointed, on behalf of the family, if we did not get a full apology on behalf of the Government," he said.

"We are not looking for a judicial review or compensation."

SDLP South Belfast MP Alasdair McDonnell,, who knows the family well, said he fully supported its stance in seeking a formal apology from the army.

"This report confirms what people in the area have known since that day - that he was an innocent man gratuitously shot by the army - then lied about," he said.

South Belfast Sinn Féin MLA Alex Maskey has also echoed the call.

"Billy McKavanagh was an unarmed man shot dead by the British Army in cold blood," he said.

"For 40 years the British State has stuck to the lie that Billy McKavanagh was an armed IRA volunteer. The HET report today lays this lie bare.

"The British State now needs to act on this HET report, accept the reality of the situation and apologise to the McKavanagh family."

© UTV News
Comments Comments
47 Comments
spectator in some where over the rainbow wrote (278 days ago):
@ Carryduff stop back tracking on what you said, you are very good at labelling communities and that's about it.
Carryduff in Belfast wrote (280 days ago):
Spectator--I did not label everyone in the Markets as criminals. I said I would not walk throught there after dark. Likewise West Belfast.
spectator in some where over the rainbow wrote (282 days ago):
Lorna, if you read my last comment you will see that the criminals issue was directed at Carryduff. Why do you assume that anyone that is critical of the army or police is an IRA supporter. The SDLP supported the call from this family for an apology. As for my age, you make another assumption. I am old enough and wise enough to know what went on here. Differnce between you and I is, I blame all sides, you just want to blame one side.
lorna in limavady wrote (283 days ago):
Spectator. Were do I in my comment label people from the markets area as criminals ? When you don't seem to understand WHY the army was needed here and WHY this accidental shooting took place I have tried to explain why. It maybe the case you were not born then and have not had the FULL facts explained. There are two sides to every story but some people here only want to believe the army was up to nothing good and I dispute that by saying the real villians were the IRA and anyone who was caught up with them knew no peace. This I heard from a Nationalist voter
spectator in some where over the rainbow wrote (284 days ago):
@Carryduff and Lorna and fRANK. Carryduff - You labled everyone in the Market area as a criminal and you did the same in a recent article about those living in West Belfast. I am hardly going to agree with idiotic comments such as yours.That's not throwing anything out of the pram, that just plain common sense. Lorna, I have not mentioned support for SF or the IRA in any of my comments and I personally couldn't care less if they have called for an apology as the family's opinion means more that any politicans.The quest to clear this mans name was driven by the family.I dont think that is unreasonable, if your loved one was killed,labled a gunman, bomber and looter when all were untrue, I think you too would feel aggrieved and would do all you could to clear his/her name. fRANK all Billy had was a pair of waders which he had found lying in the street, this fact was confirmed by witnesses, the army have admitted that he didn't have a gun, the RUC investigation at the time stated he didnt throw a bomb despite having been accused of having done so by the very soldiers that shot him. So why dont you leave this person integrity and his family alone and stop spewing you hate filled comments.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES