Poots responds to gay blood ruling

Published Monday, 14 October 2013
Toggle font size

Health Minister Edwin Poots has said it is now up to Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt to decide what happens next in relation to the lifetime ban on gay men giving blood in Northern Ireland.

Poots responds to gay blood ruling
Health Minister Edwin Poots reacted to Friday's ruling. (© Pacemaker)

Last week, a High Court ruled that the prohibition here is irrational and that Mr Poots breached the ministerial code by failing to take the issue before the Executive.

The DUP minister came to the Assembly on Monday afternoon to give his reaction to the ruling, saying he will now pass the matter over to his Westminster counterpart.

Mr Poots admitted he may have made a mistake in regard to the ministerial code.

He said: "I suspect most of the material that would be on the in tray would be material that at some point would have to be brought before the Executive and therefore the independent decision making that many ministers have applied heretofore may be something that is lost.

"I suspect that many of the people who are baying and crowing may be the people that have most to lose as a consequence of Lord Justice Treacy's judgment in this issue."

Sinn Féin also asked what power the Speaker has to take action on the breach of the code.

Caitriona Ruane said: "I would like the DUP to explain why they are resisting gay rights as seen with the ban on gay men donating blood although the medical evidence has shown that this blood is screened and as safe as blood donated by other groups.

"In terms of equality it is important that the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community have the same rights as everyone else yet this is being denied day and daily by the failure not to bring a strategy forward."

Speaking earlier in the Assembly, there was no hint of censure from First Minister Peter Robinson for his Health Minister.

Instead he warned against the judiciary taking too much to do with political matters.

The DUP leader said: "With regard to the decision being in breach of the ministerial code, the provisions were included during my party's negotiations.

"They have been discussed on a number of occasions at Executive meetings, and we have taken advice from time to time from the Attorney General.

"There has been a general Executive view that if we were to carry it to the level to which Mr Justice Treacy carried it, everything would come to the Executive.

"There would be no spending or individual decisions by Ministers, and everything would have to come to the Executive Committee."

Friday's verdict on gay blood donation, in a challenge brought by an unidentified homosexual man, represents a major victory for campaigners seeking equal status with the rest of the UK.

The complete prohibition - put in place during the 1980s AIDS threat - was lifted in England, Scotland and Wales in November 2011.

It was replaced by new rules which allow blood from men whose last sexual contact with another man was more than a year ago. The 12-month deferral was left in place following a Government Advisory Committee report.

It identified a much shorter period during which infection with blood-borne viruses could not be detected.

Mr Poots maintained the ban in Northern Ireland on the grounds of ensuring public safety.

© UTV News
Comments Comments
Martin in Carrick wrote (465 days ago):
Poor Pinky, education is a wonderful thing. Hasn't anyone ever told you, you can't catch "gay" from a blood transfusion. Here's a thought for you. How would you know who the blood came from, or would you just turn down any blood. Poots should try engaging his brain before he opens his mouth maybe then he would say something sensible.
James in belfast city centre wrote (466 days ago):
@pinky Im sure if you were lying in a hospital bed in urgent need of a life or death blood transfusion you wouldn't care where it came from. A gay man willing to donate blood to save your life and you'd reject it on the grounds of his sexual attraction to other men? Its people like you that hold the progression of humanity back.
k in armagh wrote (467 days ago):
Typical pre-historic views from very narrow minded people. When are our so called elected representatives going to do anything for the good of Northern Ireland. Religious views should be kept out of politics though seems if its not about flags or protests then our MPs do absolutely nothing for their people.
Gay and proud in belfast wrote (467 days ago):
Sharon in Belfast wrote (467 days ago):
We wonder why our country is such a mess! Half wits like this representing us, no sorry he represents his own views. Resignation should be forced!
Email address*:    
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
January snow
Tue 13 January 2015
Wed 07 January 2015
Archaelogical finds in Derry
Thu 22 January 2015