No collusion in Nelson murder

Published Monday, 23 May 2011
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

The State and RUC failed to protect Lurgan solicitor Rosemary Nelson before her murder in 1999 but did not collude in her killing, Northern Ireland Secretary Owen Paterson has said.

Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Nelson findings
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Father ‘died heartbroken’
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    ‘Risk reduced’
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Collusion question
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Analysis: O’Loan
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Analysis: McCaffrey

Unveiling the long-awaited report into the killing in a statement to the Commons, Mr Paterson said there was no evidence that the state "conspired in or planned" her murder.

But he said "omissions" by state agencies made the high-profile lawyer "more at risk and more vulnerable".

The Northern Ireland Office, the Royal Ulster Constabulary, the Army and the Security Service "failed to take reasonable and proportionate steps" to safeguard her life, he said.

But the inquiry, which investigated allegations of police collusion, found "no evidence of any act by or within any of the state agencies... which directly facilitated" the killing.

I am profoundly sorry that omissions by the state rendered Rosemary Nelson more at risk and more vulnerable.

Secretary of State Owen Paterson

Mrs Nelson, 40, was killed when a bomb planted by the loyalist Red Hand Defenders detonated under her car as she left her home in Lurgan on 15 March 1999.

The mother-of-three represented a number of high-profile republicans, including Colin Duffy, who is currently in jail charged with the dissident murder of two soldiers outside Massereene army base in March 2009.

Mrs Nelson also took on the prominent role of legal adviser to a Catholic residents' group that opposed Orange Order marches in the infamous Drumcree parade stand-off.

Human rights groups raised concerns about the solicitor's safety following claims of intimidation by security forces and loyalist paramilitaries.

The damning report, which cost £46.5m and took six years to complete, is highly critical of the RUC.

It says: "We cannot exclude the possibility of a rogue member or members of the RUC or the Army in some way assisting the murderers to target Rosemary Nelson."

"If Rosemary Nelson had been given advice about her safety and offered security measures, then assuming that she had accepted such advice and security measures, the risk to her life and her vulnerability would have been reduced."

According to the report, "some members of the RUC publicly abused and assaulted Rosemary Nelson on the Garvaghy Road in Portadown in 1997, having the effect of legitimising her as a trophy target."

The report also states: "We believe that there was some leakage of intelligence which we believe found its way outside the RUC" and that "the leakage increased the danger to Rosemary Nelson's life."

The report found that the RUC failed "to warn Rosemary Nelson of her vulnerability and offer her security advice."

The report also concludes "the NIO did not press the RUC hard enough for full replies to their questions concerning Rosemary Nelson's personal security" and "the NIO should have proactively questioned the RUC as to what factors were considered in producing a threat assessment."

Mr Paterson said that it was "deeply regrettable" that despite a very thorough police investigation, no-one has ever been charged with Mrs Nelson's murder.

© UTV News
Comments Comments
42 Comments
marty in australia wrote (364 days ago):
Lorna. i never once mentioned republicans. As an Australian and a human rights advocate my concern was for the murder of a lawyer and the basic right of free, fair, impartial law and justice. Its common knowledge what the security forces of northern Ireland were like and what they did to this lady. To illustrate my point. why did president Jimmy carter personally intervene and stop a us arms manufactures deal with the RUC. answer: pressure from the UN and the us senate over accountability and the fear of large number civilian deaths. I'm not picking sides, i'm recalling history. A history tough in schools the world over today. Why not read some amnesty intl reports on the now defunct RUC?
Irish Ghirl in Ireland wrote (365 days ago):
There is a chasm of difference between advising publicly that there was no collusion here, and between advising that there was no real investigation into collusion. How can people be asked to rely upon a justice system that does not provide justice.....Those in power must be above reproach upon every action and in this case they certainly were not in my opinion. Leaving room for doubt creates mistrust, and as a direct result provides people with a clear reason not to have trust or faith in the powers appointed to investigate with no bias.
tomc in Belfast wrote (366 days ago):
An inquiry costing millions concludes no collusion yet mystic meg and co on here know different....typical! This woman couldn't stand the police when she was alive, let alone let them help her. In the run up to PIRA's ceasefire and them considering the same....certain others were in deep conversation with Ms Nelson....they're here, Rosemarie isn't and they're not part of the peace process.....if you want a conspiracy theory, look closer to home chaps...ask the man who's claiming collusion and to this day swears he was not part of PIRA... it's as believable as any other drivel spouted on here.
lorna in limavady wrote (366 days ago):
Marty. Your comment "the world knows what the RUC was about " WHAT ? They fought and DIED . Are you trying to say they were against Catholics. Who intimided the Catholics into not joining ? Is it not a bigot's opinion that because of a man's religion he could not serve the people. The world has heard Republican's propagator about the force. thanks to bias reporting. An RUC officer was more accountable for his actions than any other person.
James in Belfast wrote (366 days ago):
@ rod, in my opinion yes but the quicker England is an independent country the better. I'm sick of England pandering to NI. We should be allowed a referendum on the uk or atleast wether we want NI and all it's trouble.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES