UTV News - Newspaper defends Bangor picture

Subscribe to the News Feed Newsback to News

Newspaper defends Bangor picture

Text Size:  A  A |  POST A COMMENT |  PRINT |  SHARE 
The Sunday World editor has said printing a photograph of a man who had taken his own life was justified in the public interest.
Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.

The newspaper has come under fire for showing the picture of a man whose body was found at a bridge on the outskirts of Bangor on Saturday.

Editor Jim McDowell told UTV he apologised if hurt and offence had been caused to families who have lost loved ones through suicide.

But he insisted the body should never have been left in full view for several hours.

"There were no screens put up and, in terms of the public interest, the point of that story was - and the picture was published in the context of the point of the story - why was this poor man allowed to hang there for that length of time in the public domain for the public to see it and quite possibly recoil from it?" he asked.

In a statement, police said officers followed usual procedures in case of sudden death, as they must thoroughly investigate the circumstances surrounding the death, including the scene.

The statement continued: "A number of cordons and diversions were put in place during the police investigation into the death on the bridge at the Belfast Road, Bangor, and the body was removed as soon as it was possible to do so.

"Police regret any distress caused to the family or local residents."

'Shock'

Philip McTaggart from suicide awareness group PIPS said both the newspaper and the police have questions to answer.

"They should have put up a screen, they should have covered the body in some way to stop people and children from viewing this young man," said Mr Taggart, who lost his own son through suicide.

"It was totally unacceptable and an absolute shock. I couldn't believe yesterday what I was seeing and I was just looking at it in a photograph in a paper.

"So what about people and young children who were driving by, how do they feel this morning? He asked.

"I'm sure some people might even possibly need counselling after something like that."

Sinn Fein MLA for Upper Bann, John O'Dowd, has slammed the picture's publication as "totally irresponsible and reprehensible".

He said he had lodged a formal complaint with the Press Complaints Commission.

"The family of this man will be suffering enough without having his dead body photographed and published on the front page of a newspaper," he said.

"The issue of suicide is one which has tragically affected many families across the north and undoubtedly the publication of this photo will cause great hurt."

The PCC has received 70 complaints from members of the public.


Counselling support service Lifeline can be reached on 0808 808 8000.

It provides confidential crisis counselling support on difficult issues including suicidal feelings, self-harm, abuse, trauma, depression and anxiety, 24/7 every day of the year.

© UTV News

Send to a friend

Email To
Your Name
Comment
Close
At 22:26 on 06 November 2009, Katrina wrote:
I agree that the picture was quite disturbing, and I think the editors were wrong to publish this image in the news paper, ecspecially where children for instance can see. The family must feel humiliated that the body was left there for 3 hours. Also, if this was claimed a suicide, why was the mans hands tied behind his back? It is a question that puzzles me.
At 15:12 on 03 November 2009, natz wrote:
i want to see the picture
At 05:39 on 03 November 2009, Willy Hopes wrote:
I enjoyed this article. I am looking forward to the continuation since it did not go into much depth.
At 01:41 on 03 November 2009, kate tully wrote:
I totally disagree with what the sunday world has done I do not believe that they were correct in printing the picture not just on the front page but also twice inside! They said that the body should not have been left in view for several hours which is true, but have they not brought it to the attention of a larger audience? Where was the dignity for the poor man and his family there! Shame on them!
At 00:49 on 03 November 2009, Pamela Campbell wrote:
The article could have been published without the graphic photograph.
At 22:43 on 02 November 2009, Jules wrote:
Absolutely disgusting thing to do. Jim McDowell should resign if he thinks that printing a picture of a young man hanging is in the best interests of the public. I am a member of the public and it is certainly NOT in my best interest, nor the interest of my children to see that...Goodness knows how this poor mans family feel. The Sunday World really is the lowest of the low and Jim McDowell should be ashamed of himself. He is defending the indefensible
At 22:04 on 02 November 2009, Joanne wrote:
I agree that it was terrible that this picture was printed in the Sunday World. Like Emma I have a young daughter and had to hide the paper from her. Yes, it was terrible that the poor man was left for so long but did the picture have to be published just to get this point across?? I for one will definately never be buying this paper again if this is what they have to print in order to make a few more sales. And my heart goes out to the young fellow's family, friends and anyone who has lost loved ones in similiar situations who may have seen yesterdays front page.
Post a comment
Name:
Email Address:
Location:
Your Comment:
Verification Code: Captcha Code  Get New Code
POST COMMENT
[Before posting, please take a moment to familiarise yourself with our house rules. All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Any information you enter, including email and web addresses, will be displayed on our site if passed by our moderators.]