NI Water applicant 'discriminated against'

Published Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

An employment tribunal has ruled that a candidate for the position of chairman of Northern Ireland Water was subjected to unlawful religious discrimination during the appointment process conducted by Department of Regional Development.

Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.

To find out if this video is available to you, we need to know what region you live in. Please enter your postcode below (including space).

Frequently Asked Questions

Thank you for confirming your region.

Frequently Asked Questions

We are sorry but this video is not available on u.tv in your region. Your region is listed below.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are you in Northern Ireland?

1. Why is my postcode required?

We are asking you to insert your postcode before watching some videos to confirm you can access the video content via u.tv.

This is because some videos on u.tv are only available in Northern Ireland.

Don't worry, we won't store or use this information for any other purpose.

If you are not in Northern Ireland, the content may be available to watch at itv.com or stv.tv.

2. Why am I directed to itv.com or stv.tv when I try to view certain clips?

The videos, which are not available on u.tv to users outside Northern Ireland, will be available to those users on itv.com (for users in England and Wales) or stv.tv (for most users in Scotland).

We need to know where you are in order to make sure you are getting the right content.

If you think we've got your location wrong, then please click here.

Need more help? Contact us

Dr Alan Lennon was not appointed to the position and subsequently took a case against the DSD, assisted by the Equality Commission.

The Fair Employment Tribunal has now said it is satisfied that the successful candidate, Sean Hogan, was appointed as chairman of NI Water "because he was not from a Protestant background and because he was known to the Minister and his ministerial colleagues".

Dr Lennon, a Protestant, was interviewed for the post and was deemed appointable by the selection panel, along with three other Protestant candidates and one Roman Catholic candidate.

He made the case that he believed that he had greater relevant experience than the successful candidate and further argued that the then Minister Conor Murphy added new criteria to the essential criteria established at the beginning of the process, in breach of the Public Appointments Commissioner's Code.

The Tribunal was satisfied that three factors were introduced by the Minister as additional essential criteria and that "the provisions of the Code do not, in the Tribunal's view, permit the use of additional criteria".

"I brought this case to shine a light on what I feel is a selection system that is not fit for purpose," Dr Lennon said.

"I am very pleased that it appears that this case will put in train changes and improvements to the processes around public appointments."

However, former DRD minister Conor Murphy says he "absolutely refute any allegation of discrimination against Alan Lennon on religious grounds."

He said:"I stand over all of the appointments I made as the Regional Development Minister and adhered to all the set criteria for such appointments.

"The Department have six weeks to decide whether to appeal this ruling. Having read the ruling myself I would be urging the Department to utilise the appeals process."

Evelyn Collins, Chief Executive of the Equality Commission, added: "The Commission welcomes this important confirmation that public appointments, including those which involve the exercise of a Minister's discretion, are fully and clearly within the protection of the anti-discrimination legislation.

"We supported this case because it is our view that the standards of fairness and non-discrimination that we expect in employment situations should apply equally to all public appointments."

Ulster Unionist Leader, Mike Nesbitt, described the findings as "extremely concerning."

The Strangford MLA said: "Sinn Fein has set themselves up as the Party of equality but their credibility in this area has been totally and utterly shredded."

He added: "There will be increased scrutiny on all Sinn Fein appointments, past, present and future, following the tribunal conclusions."

Alliance Regional Development spokesperson Stewart Dickson says the industrial tribunal decision has raised a lot of questions.

The East Antrim MLA said: "This tribunal decision has raised a lot of questions for both Conor Murphy and the Department for Regional Development as to what happened in this application process."

He added: " I will also be raising this issue with the Assembly Speaker when the Assembly next sits on Monday for I believe there is a role for him to play in looking into the actions of three former Ministers.

"There may even be a case for Mr Murphy to appear before the Assembly Regional Development Committee."

The tribunal will reconvene at a later date to decide on the nature and amount of compensation.

© UTV News
Comments Comments
15 Comments
Steve in Belfast wrote (333 days ago):
Ryan, the only person following any "agenda" here is you: That's the tragedy of this place, people support their chosen bigots no matter what they see happen. Shame on you.
Ryan in Belfast wrote (334 days ago):
@Steve, Belfast. Steve, i'll be remaining a Sinn Fein supporter because Sinn Fein are against discrimination in all its forms. Now, with this situation involving Conor Murphy is obviously not a very good example of that but his actions dont reflect the attitude of all of Sinn Fein nor their voters. Steve, i have seen plenntly of your other comments on other videos and i know you have a Loyalist agenda.
Steve in Belfast wrote (334 days ago):
Ryan, I've never voted for any party guilty of sectarian discrimination. Your sectarian stereotyping is entirely typical of the SF fanbase, unfortunately. If you truly are against sectarian discrimination, you wouldn't vote SF.
Martin in Belfast wrote (334 days ago):
Ryan, fair enough on your last post. I think both "sides" here have to accept that discrimination has, and does occur on both sides. The sooner we recognise that, maybe the sooner we can move forward and tackle it.
Ryan in Belfast wrote (334 days ago):
@Martin, Belfast. Martin, I do accept that the tribunal found Conor Murphy to be discriminating but my post is mainly aimed at steve who doesnt care about who is discriminated against, all he worries about is his Loyalist beliefs. Discrimination in ALL its forms, against protestant and catholics has to end and should never be tolerated. The protestant man who applied for the job of Chairman of NI water should be re-interviewed. Im a Catholic and im totally against discrimination in all its forms.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
On the rocks
Wed 01 May 2013
4x4 in Ballycastle harbour
Thu 02 May 2013