'Mistake' to put value on lives - Eames

Published Friday, 10 July 2009
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

The proposer of controversial payments for Northern Ireland terrorism victims has said it might have been a mistake to put a value on lives lost.

Lord Robin Eames added the £12,000 recognition sum was based on an equivalent grant already paid out by the Irish Government, but admitted matters could have been handled differently.

Northern Ireland Secretary Shaun Woodward ruled out compensation earlier this year after it prompted a fierce backlash from unionists and some victims groups because it would include republican and loyalist paramilitaries.

On Friday, Lord Eames said: "We knew that after a very heated period of debate this recommendation might overshadow all the other proposals and be very hurtful within the victim family for those who felt that there was an equivalence being advanced between perpetrator and victim.

"With the benefit of hindsight, we might have chosen a different way or different words - we might not even have mentioned a figure."

The report was published in January by the Consultative Group on the Past, an independent group chaired by former Church of Ireland primate Lord Eames and ex-Catholic priest Denis Bradley.

It was established to deal with the legacy of Northern Ireland's troubles, during which more than 3,000 people died.

The proposals included a legacy commission which would be led by an international figure.

This commission would take over the work currently carried out by the police ombudsman, which investigates complaints against the police, and the Historical Enquiries Team - a specialist police unit set up to investigate unsolved killings throughout the Troubles.

Lord Eames was writing in the newsletter of lobby group the Committee on the Administration of Justice.

He added: "We followed the current law, the Victims and Survivors' Order 2006.

"This makes no attempt to draw any distinction in victimhood, it applies across the board irrespective of who the victim was.

"So when we adhered to the frequent request to give recognition to victims, that recognition could not propose a hierarchy of victims."

The Northern Ireland Office has begun consulting on the report.

Mr Bradley also wrote in the CAJ newsletter: "One of the things that has been said about this report is that it flattens out morality by making everybody the same.

"Nonsense. It does the exact opposite; what it says is that all human beings are capable of killing their neighbour in particular circumstances.

"And the history of humankind is that we have killed neighbours and people we don't know; but if we went and met them and listened to them, and got to know them we might be able to move away from a divided past and find mutual forgiveness and reconciliation."

© Press Association
Comments Comments
2 Comments
Susan in Nottingham wrote (1,047 days ago):
Lord Eames is correct, the Act says: "someone who has been bereaved as a result of or in consequence of a conflict-related incident." It does not differentiate so Eames & Bradley were bound by that criteria. Now we have the anomaly that victims in N. Ireland have been treated differently to those in the Republic due to the response to the report. It was NOT compensation, it was recognition.
lorna in limavady wrote (1,049 days ago):
YES big mistake Lord Eames putting together those who chose to take life and those who chose to protect it, those who were innocent victims caught up in the spiral of man's inhumanity to man. There is no price you can put on a loved one but you can disrespect their memory and that adds to the hurt
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]