UTV News - Legal battle journalist Breen 'vindicated'

Subscribe to the News Feed Newsback to News

Legal battle journalist Breen 'vindicated'

Text Size:  A  A |  POST A COMMENT |  PRINT |  SHARE 
Suzanne Breen, northern editor of the Sunday Tribune
Journalist Suzanne Breen who won a legal battle with police seeking to force her to surrender information on the Real IRA has been spared from a £50,000 legal bill.

Belfast Recorder Judge Tom Burgess ruled that the PSNI should pay 75% of the costs Ms Breen incurred by resisting an application to order her to hand over a mobile telephone, computer records and notes on the dissident republican organisation.

Ms Breen said she felt vindicated by the result, but that the case should never have been taken in the first place.

"I feel and the newspaper feels completely vindicated by our stand," she said.

"This is an endorsement of the freedom of the press and hopefully will mean the PSNI never again put another journalist and another newspaper in this position."

Police had sought the material from the northern editor of the Sunday Tribune newspaper as part of their investigation into the killing of two soldiers.

She received the Real IRA's claim of responsibility for the murders of Sappers Mark Quinsey and Patrick Azimkar outside Massereene barracks in Co Antrim in March.

Judge Burgess dismissed the police application in June because it would breach the journalist's right to life under the European Convention on Human Rights to order her to surrender the information.

Following that decision Ms Breen returned to court to seek an order that her costs in the case should be met by the PSNI.

In his judgment the Recorder said police would have been aware when making the application that she was arguing her life would be at risk if she complied.

He concluded the PSNI would have assessed this risk due to its unique position in considering the general security background.

"I am satisfied that from an early stage it would have been clear to them what those risks were and that I have no evidence in front of me to suggest that at any stage they intended to challenge that factual backdrop by production of evidence of their own," he said.

© UTV News

Send to a friend

Email To
Your Name
Comment
Close
Comments
0 Comments
Be the first to comment
Post a comment
Name:
Email Address:
Location:
Your Comment:
Verification Code: Captcha Code  Get New Code
POST COMMENT
[Before posting, please take a moment to familiarise yourself with our house rules. All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Any information you enter, including email and web addresses, will be displayed on our site if passed by our moderators.]