Published Tuesday, 07 January 2014
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.
Are you in Northern Ireland?
1. Why is my postcode required?
We are asking you to insert your postcode before watching some videos to confirm
you can access the video content via u.tv.
This is because some videos on u.tv
are only available in Northern Ireland.
Don't worry, we won't store or use this information for any other purpose.
If you are not in Northern Ireland, the content may be available to watch at itv.com or stv.tv.
2. Why am I directed to itv.com
or stv.tv when I try to view certain
The videos, which are not available on u.tv
to users outside Northern Ireland, will be available to those users on itv.com (for users in England and Wales) or stv.tv (for most users in Scotland).
We need to know where you are in order to make sure you are getting the right content.
If you think we've got your location wrong, then please
Need more help? Contact us
Mr Kelly was handed an informed warning after he stood in front of the armoured Land Rover in the Carrick Hill area of the city in June.
The MLA said he was trying to speak to police about the arrest of a young man just moments before he was pushed down the street on the front of the PSNI vehicle.
Tensions had been raised after the annual Tour of the North parade passed through the area.
Following an investigation, Mr Kelly accepted an informed warning which will remain on his criminal record for 12 months.
It has since emerged that a complaint about the officer driving the vehicle was made to the Police Ombudsman which passed its file on to the Public Prosecution Service (PPS).
The PPS has confirmed that, as in the Kelly case, the police officer has been offered an informed warning by means of a "diversionary disposal".
A PPS statement said: "That the case for prosecution is met in the case involving Mr Gerard Kelly MLA and a police officer.
"Having regard to all circumstances of the case it was concluded that diversionary disposals were appropriate."
If the officer refuses the warning, he would be liable to face prosecution.
The Police Federation claims the officer has not yet received the warning and they say they will oppose any disciplinary action.
© UTV News