Jury 'was divided' over shot IRA man

Published Monday, 24 June 2013
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

The jury at an inquest into the death of an IRA man shot by police nearly 21 years ago was ineffective and "hopelessly divided", the High Court has heard.

Jury 'was divided' over shot IRA man
Mr Jordan, 23, was shot dead by the RUC in 1992. (© Pacemaker)

Lawyers for the family of Pearse Jordan claimed findings reached at the tribunal were unfair and should be quashed.

In a wide ranging legal challenge, they also contested a decision to deny them the chance to deploy parts of reports into so-called shoot-to-kill incidents.

A judge was urged to order a new inquest into the shooting.

Jordan, 23, was killed in disputed circumstances on the Falls Road, west Belfast in November 1992.

Witnesses claimed the RUC shot him in the back as he tried to flee after the stolen car he was driving was rammed.

His death was one of several high-profile cases in Northern Ireland involving allegations of a 'shoot-to-kill' policy operated by the security forces.

Last October a long-delayed inquest failed to reach agreement on key aspects.

The jury was split on whether reasonable force was used in the circumstances, the state of belief on the part of the officer who fired the fatal shots, and whether any alternative course of action was open to him.

They did agree that Jordan was shot by an RUC officer after he got out a red Ford Orion car which had been forcibly brought to a stop on the Falls Road.

Jurors also endorsed the findings of a post mortem examination that he died of a bullet wound to his chest.

Lawyers for the Jordan family were due to appeal against being refused permission to use reports into the 'shoot-to-kill' claims as part of cross-examination of three police witnesses at the inquest.

However, that challenge has now been included in a much more wide-ranging legal bid to have the jury's findings thrown out.

A two-day hearing to establish whether their application for a judicial review has an arguable chance of success is underway at the High Court in Belfast.

They want an order quashing the coroner's refusal to permit the next of kin to deploy narrative and analysis from the reports into six deaths John Stalker, the former assistant chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, and Sir Colin Sampson of West Yorkshire Police, investigated to try to establish whether police intended to kill.

Legal papers submitted as part of their case also focus on the jury and its findings.

The family is seeking a declaration that the coroner ought not to have accepted a verdict from a jury which was "hopelessly divided in circumstances where the verdict could not and did not determine any issue in contention".

They are also seeking a ruling that the failure to discharge the jury was a breach of the Coroners (NI) Act and a declaration that the coroner's decision to accept the jury's verdict was a failure to comply with human rights legislation.

It was further claimed that granting either anonymity or screening to security force witnesses undermined the effectiveness of the inquest, public confidence in it, and the next of kin's right to participate properly.

On that basis, counsel for the Jordan family argued that the tribunal was both unfair and unlawful.

The hearing continues.

© UTV News
Comments Comments
6 Comments
John in Belfast wrote (515 days ago):
Shoot to kill whats the problem the ira stated they are soldiers fighting a war so what else do they expect i think they need to look up what way a war is fought they didnt have any restricions why should police and soldiers ? And if it was a genuine war some of them would ne charged with war crimes
MATTHEW BROGAN in craigavon wrote (515 days ago):
dave if it was a member of your family would you let it go?
Sean in Wales wrote (515 days ago):
this young man was given no chance that's why it should be brought up again the police can't get away with murder Mr Jordan didn't kill anyone did he get away with anything his only crime was being Irish
office dibble in UK wrote (516 days ago):
What was the intent of the IRA when they opened fire ? If it had have been the pursuing RUC Officer that was shot and killed, we would not be sitting here having an inquiry into the circumstances.
Dave in UK wrote (516 days ago):
What is the point of dragging all this up again ?? Let bygones be bygones.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
Flash flooding
Thu 13 November 2014
I
Wed 12 November 2014
The X Factor Live: Week 4
Sat 01 November 2014