Jeans theft mum wins jail appeal

Published Friday, 01 April 2011
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

A Co Tyrone single mother has won her appeal against being jailed for stealing a £10 pair of jeans.

Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.

Alison Hewitt was instead ordered to serve 100 hours community, after senior judges ruled the original three-month prison sentence was manifestly excessive.

Following her successful challenge, the 27-year-old said: "I'm just glad it's over."

Hewitt, from Patterson Park in Strabane, was convicted by a jury of stealing the jeans from a small clothes shop in Londonderry in August 2009.

A four-day Crown Court trial heard how she took three pairs into a changing room, along with her young daughter in a pram, but only returned two.

The severity of the punishment handed down to the first-time offender provoked widespread public shock.

Her lawyers argued in the Court of Appeal on Friday that it went beyond a reasonable response to the offence of shoplifting.

Barrister Martin McCann said: "The courts must behave in a humane way.

"This is a civilised society and it only becomes less civilised for the courts not to demonstrate the sort of humanity I would suggest this case obviously deserves."

Responding to his submissions, Lord Chief Justice Sir Declan Morgan said those who target shopkeepers trying to run businesses in difficult times must realise they risk going to jail.

The court heard how the method used to remove a security tag from the jeans will remain a mystery.

Prosecuting counsel argued that Hewitt using her sleeping child to take the buggy into the changing room was an aggravating factor.

Judges rejected that submission but took more notice of the status of the shop targeted.

Sir Declan said: "This is the sort of independent trader which the law is there to protect."

He also agreed with the trial judge's description of Hewitt's actions as being calculated, premeditated and deliberate.

But Sir Declan took note of her age, lack of any previous convictions and her parental responsibilities - he said these factors may not have been as obvious and developed before the trial judge as they were on appeal.

"We have concluded in this difficult case, having regard to the matters now before us, this case just falls on the side of sentencing which takes it outside or below the custody threshold," he said.

Holding that the jail term should be interfered with for being manifestly excessive, the court imposed 100 hours community service as a substitute punishment.

Hewitt, who had been out on bail pending the outcome of the hearing, spoke only to express her relief at the resolution.

© UTV News
Comments Comments
11 Comments
Rev Stephen Hazlett in Sunderland , England wrote (409 days ago):
Was back home in Co. Tyrone when I read about this case . She should not have stolen but it was only £ 10 at the end of the day . Shops do need protection , but we do not live in the police state that this judge who sentenced her so harshly seems to think . His ability to be a judge is clearly in question . Bankers steal millions form the public by the hour and alas they are never punished
Jamesbelfast in Belfast wrote (415 days ago):
Just a wee reminder to Claire. Do you realise you are paying for the cost of shop-lifting. Shop-keepers have to add such losses into their expected profits so in essence the public have had to pay twice - once to the shop-keeper when we buy something and again for court and prosecution costs. Now if someone comes a stealing money put of your purse or pocket how do you think they should be treated. Yes I do believe this woman may have been treated harshly but I do believe she was fully aware she was stealing and found guilty of such but went on to thieve further from the public by attempting to get away with it in a higher court. Personally I do believe she should be made to pay for all costs concerned and if she can't afford to pay the costs she should serve an appropriate penalty. Yes it is sad to see a child invoved in this case but this woman did actively set out to abuse this child rights in her attempt to commit a crime. She also took the risk of being given a custodial sentence - again depriving her child of its rights to parental care. If someone deliberately sets out to use and abuse their child then you have to ask yourself are they fit to be a parent. Oh by the way Gerard this woman didn't make a mistake she deliberately set out to commit a crime - there is a difference between commiting a crime and genuinely making an error.
OldSod in Fermanagh wrote (416 days ago):
“Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society’s understanding.” Claire, its everybody's business when criminals are encouraged and tolerated by an impotent and weak justice system and a society unwilling to stand up for the difference between "right and wrong". Shoplifting is not a mistake, its simply crime based on greed.
gerard in Belfast wrote (417 days ago):
"WIND" your neck in Norm,this is a young mother that made a mistake, dont tell me you've never made one,you should go get a job with the Judiciary and fill the Jails to capacity,then lets see how much the tax payer gets done over for,sleep well "NORM".
Claire in N.ireland wrote (417 days ago):
This is very rude what you think Norman . Think of the child it would not be fair to put her into care . It would be sinful to take this young mother away from her child and family for that length of time . It is no ones buissness anyhow !!
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES