IRA 'fired first shot' in Loughgall

Published Friday, 02 December 2011
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

A report into one of the most controversial cases of the Troubles says the IRA fired the first shot during a gun battle with the SAS at the RUC police station in Loughgall in 1987.

Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.

The Historical Enquiries Team has concluded that the IRA unit was to blame for shooting first before being wiped out by the SAS, according to the Belfast Telegraph.

The newspaper is reporting on Friday that the investigation team has said those involved in the gun attack could not have been arrested safely and the SAS "were within their rights to open fire".

Victims' families have always claimed that the IRA men were targeted in a 'shoot-to-kill' operation.

Eight IRA men and one innocent civilian were killed in the attack in May 1987.

Sinn Féin MLA Barry McElduff said: "The men killed at Loughgall were victims of a British Government policy of shoot-to-kill.

Nobody believes that the British Army unit was sent into Loughgall that evening to arrest anybody.

Sinn Féin MLA Barry McElduff

"They were sent there to kill the IRA unit and that is what they did. If the HET try and put forward a different theory it will say more about that groups credibility than anything else."

The HET report is expected to be released next month.

The police unit, set up to investigate murders during the Troubles, has refused to comment on the matter.

The Belfast Telegraph's Political Editor Liam Clarke, who wrote the story, said he is confident his sources have seen the report.

"I can't disclose my sources because it was confidential but I am confident that the people I spoke to knew what was in the report," he told UTV.

"I am sure this won't end the dispute - there will be arguments that there should have been a cordon around the area and so on but I am confident that those are the findings of the report."

However DUP MLA William Irwin said it will have to be accepted.

The report completely debunks the republican myths which have been propagated to cover up the truth about what happened that day.

DUP MLA William Irwin

"There are some within Northern Ireland who accept any report alleging wrongdoing by the Police, Army or other agencies of the State without question," Mr Irwin said.

"In circumstances now where a report has demonstrated that members of the Armed Forces acted legitimately they must now accept the veracity of this too."

Human rights groups the Committee on the Administration of Justice and the Pat Finucane Centre have raised serious concerns as to how potentially inaccurate information, allegedly reflecting findings of an unpublished report by the HET into the Loughgall killings, has been published in the media, without families being informed.

CAJ acted on behalf of the families when this case was taken to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg and, together with the PFC, have continued to assist the families since then.

Brian Gormally, Director of CAJ said: "We have serious questions to ask as to whether and why someone from within the security establishment has made claims as to the content of the yet unpublished report into the killings at Loughgall.

"The families do not yet know what is actually contained within this report or whether it represents a full independent investigation. However, we are conscious of the risk that the first headline usually sticks in the mind of the public, regardless of what full and accurate picture subsequently emerges. The fact that the families of the deceased learned of these claims in today's media, is of great concern to us."

© UTV News
Comments Comments
56 Comments
Mark O in Londonderry wrote (170 days ago):
and they got what was coming to them. 1 of the weapons recovered from the eliminated terrorists had been taken from the dead body of William Clement, killed two years earlier in the attack on Ballygawley RUC barracks. Another was linked to the murder of Harold Henry. No mercy was shown to those 2 yet SF still maintain IRA men should have been arrested! Wise Up.Republicans maintain they were fighting a war but still complain that the Brits dared to shoot back, with better aimed shoots. Move On Barry!
jackie in belfast wrote (171 days ago):
The SAS did the job they were brought into Loughall for, the IRA were engaged in an act of war because they were at war weren,t they? In war opposing soldiers do not make arrests they shoot to kill that is the sad fact of war !
ed in belfast wrote (171 days ago):
No way were these people out to kill the police they were all going for a pint of milk and a paper how dare you say other wise . lets get real here the IRA were shameful cowards they could only kill when their victims could nt defend themselves , they wouldnt face the army head on cus they knew they would end up in a box and yet they try to tell their own community thet were soldiers it is laughable COWARDS THATS ALL THEY WERE
Jill in Omagh wrote (172 days ago):
@ Dave, typical unionist looking Niall to pretend the North isnt on the island of Ireland and that the orange state wasn't gerrymandered to suit a minority in Ireland
Niall in Armagh wrote (172 days ago):
Yes lorna, Protestants do get enquiries, When the story came up the other day of the 2 top RUC men killed in south Armagh i wrote on it 'loyalists will ignore this story so they can keep on complaining that they never get enquiries' and sure enough I was right no mention on it, Billy Wright a cold blooded terrorist cost millions to investigate,Gerry Mcgeough was jailed years after shooting an off duty RUC man quite recently too, I can't go on all day but don't think theres a point this will be selective reading anything i write anyhow
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES