Gay marriage 'bestiality' remark slammed

Published Wednesday, 13 June 2012
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

The Ulster Unionist Party has moved to distance itself from highly controversial remarks about bestiality made by party peer Lord Ken Maginnis, during a radio debate on gay marriage.

Gay marriage 'bestiality' remark slammed
UUP peer Lord Ken Maginnis made the remarks during a radio debate. (© Pacemaker)

Lord Maginnis spoke out in strong opposition of allowing same-sex couples to marry in church, repeatedly referring to it as "unnatural and deviant behaviour" which shouldn't be "imposed" on society.

The senior politician then went further, telling the Stephen Nolan Show that gay relationships were "a rung on the ladder" towards bestiality.

Referring to campaigns to allow the same rights for same-sex couples when it comes to marriage, Lord Maginnis said it all came down to sexual practice.

"Does that mean that every deviant practice has to be accommodated? Will the next thing be that we legislate for some sort of bestiality?" he asked.

Lord Maginnis was speaking in a personal capacity without our knowledge or permission and his comments do not reflect Ulster Unionist Party policy.

UUP

John O'Doherty from The Rainbow Project, a group representing the gay community in Northern Ireland, said the comments were "completely disgusting" and only served to fuel serious negative attitudes which already exist.

"When we hear such rampant homophobia coming from a senior politician here in Northern Ireland, where else would we expect people's attitudes to come from?" he said.

"At a time when an Equality Commission survey has found that negative attitudes towards lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in Northern Ireland have significantly hardened, it is reprehensible that a senior politician should claim that people in loving and committed relationships are 'unnatural' and 'deviant'."

Calling on Lord Maginnis to retract his comments, Mr O'Doherty added: "Many LGB&T people feel isolated and vulnerable in their communities and the ridiculous claims made by Lord Maginnis only compound this isolation.

"What was equally worrying was that Lord Maginnis advised that young people coming to terms with their sexual orientation should seek the assistance of a physician or psychiatrist as if there is something wrong with them.

"This is completely unacceptable."

During Wednesday morning's radio show, Lord Maginnis moved to defend his argument when challenged.

"You've asked me to define it as I see it, as it affects my church, as it may affect children ... I just do not believe that we should be doing anything to encourage this deviant practice," he said.

"If my next-door neighbour is homosexual, I will treat him with the same day-to-day respect as I will treat the neighbour on the other side."

Any young people listening this morning should know that there is nothing wrong with them, and that help and support is available for them at The Rainbow Project.

John O’Doherty

A survey by the Equality Commission has been looking into how attitudes towards people from different backgrounds have changed in Northern Ireland over the last six years.

The findings, published on Wednesday, show increased negativity - including towards the gay community.

Just over a quarter of people surveyed said they would object to having a gay neighbour.

While the UUP distanced itself from the remarks by Lord Maginnis, a call has been made for party leader Mike Nesbitt to take disciplinary action over the issue.

Alliance Party chief whip Stewart Dickson said he was appalled by the "outrageous" remarks.

"There is no way that Mike Nesbitt can get away with saying that Lord Maginnis was speaking in a personal capacity," he said.

"He was representing the UUP when he spoke and I am sure that many people will take his words as UUP policy until strong disciplinary action is taken."

The SDLP's spokesman on equality issues, Colum Eastwood, said both the survey's findings and the comments by Lord Maginnis brought into question "the illusion of progress".

He added: "The attitudes contained within this survey, so frighteningly personified by Ken Maginnis's startlingly offensive expressions of archaic ignorance, are a timely reminder that a resilient residue of prejudice remains in our society.

EXTERNAL LINKS / CONTACTS
"It should be named for what it is - bigotry."
© UTV News
Comments Comments
50 Comments
Tom in which, otiahc wrote (311 days ago):
As a young person in this country, you just come to expect this kind of ignorance from some members of the older generation. It's pretty hard to grow up in this country without a role model that actually has a head on their shoulders and isn't just a product of their own childhood indoctrination. Sad really.
Christopher in Belfast wrote (337 days ago):
I invite those who espouse "family values" to read the story of Lot and his daughters in Genesis 19 - seeing as the Bible is the key text used to denounce homosexuality. Before the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, God (in his infinite wisdom)decided to exterminate all but Lot and his kin. Now, as it happened, the few people saved from this genocide thenceforth engaged in incestous practices ("deviant" and "unnatural" in some circles) and produced children. So, the moral of this rather sordid story seems to be that God doesn't like homosexuals (*see Leviticus for more) but quite enjoys genocide and incest amongst his more fortunate creations. How wonderful! To pre-empt the obvious response; I suppose you could say that this story is not to be taken "literally" or that it's all down to "interpretation" - though I fail to see the poetry and metaphor at play in this one. Sorry. Unless of course, you side with the almighty and say that incest and genocide is ok with you too.
heather in belfast wrote (337 days ago):
seems to me there is a lot of humbug going on here bible quotes and the likes ,,, this is democratic society (supposedly) therefore we are all entitled to our opinion and if that is what mr mcguinness feels he has the right to say it !!! nothing said when on gay pride in belfast men were dressed as women (their choice ) making obscene gestures to elderly people in the street but i suppose that is ok ??? is it ??? a severe case of everyone entitled to their own opinion !!! if it is biblical then god made ADAM &EVE not ADAM AND STEVE !!! another opinion which i am sure will bring scorn !!!
jack in belfast wrote (338 days ago):
1. The law in England & Wales will establish civil same sex marriage, not religious same sex marriage. 2. The law on marriage is unfortunately devolved to "bigot capital of the western world" Northern Ireland. This whole augument about forcing churches to preform gay marriage is irrelevant, becuase it's not what's being proposed. And frankly, I don't know anyone who would want a priest or victor reading their vows through gritted teeth.
Ulysses32 in Belfast wrote (338 days ago):
No, Ryan. The Bible is a book written by Man, interpreted by Man, editted by Man and manipulated by Man. That is, by no means, saying there is no God, it is saying, however, that Man will use any sort of shield to justify, attack or defend actions that are contrary to morals of conscience. The Bible, as in all religious texts, can be used to justify murder and other heinous crimes against humanity. Is your God a vengeful God or is he a loving God because Man's Bible cannot make up it's mind on that. And then there is the shellfish.....
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
UVF centenary parade
Sat 20 April 2013
BGT auditions - Week 2
Sat 20 April 2013