UTV News - Brady faces fresh cover-up allegation

Subscribe to the News Feed Newsback to News

Brady faces fresh cover-up allegation

Text Size:  A  A |  POST A COMMENT |  PRINT |  SHARE 
The head of the Catholic Church in Ireland was closely involved in the recent settlement of a sex abuse case in Northern Ireland, where £45,000 was paid out to a victim in exchange for her silence, UTV revealed.
Video available to UK viewers only.
We’re sorry. This video is unavailable from your location.
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Brady under fire
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    ‘Questions’ – Victims group
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Church statement
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Victim’s reaction
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    NI abuse inquiry
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Victim ‘devastated’
  • This video has been Geoblocked to UK viewers ONLY!
    Church in crisis: Analysis

On Wednesday, Cardinal Sean Brady said he was considering his position following revelations he failed to alert the authorities in 1975 about serial abuser Father Brendan Smyth.

The latest case to emerge involves a woman who alleges she was raped by Father Joseph Quinn of the Archdiocese of Armagh in 1997 when she was 17-years-old, and whose claim was settled out of court in the past few months.

Document

UTV obtained the draft document settling the claim, naming the victim, the alleged perpetrator and Cardinal Brady.

The terms of the contract show she was to be paid £45,000 by Fr Joseph Quinn to cover for damages and legal costs.

But there would be no acceptance of liability on the part of either defendant, and the victim would not be allowed to speak out about her allegations, particularly to the media.

In a statement, a spokesman for Cardinal Brady confirmed the Irish Primate met the victim's father "recently".

But Cardinal Brady insists he was not party to any confidentiality agreement.

"The complainant and Fr Quinn settled the case between themselves," a church statement said.

"Cardinal Brady was not involved in the discussions between the complainant and Fr Quinn other than to make it clear that he would not be a party to any confidentiality agreement between Fr Quinn and the complainant, that he intended to commence a canonical process and to invite the complainant to assist as a witness by giving evidence in that canonical process."

Allegations were made to the police by two young women aged 17 and 18 against Fr Joseph Quinn in 2001, the spokesman confirmed.

"The day following the police interview, Cardinal Brady suspended Fr Joseph Quinn from ministry as a priest, forbidding him to say Mass publicly, to hear confessions and to have unsupervised access to minors."

Police launched an investigation into the teenage girl's claims but the Public Prosecution Service concluded that there was insufficient evidence to bring charges.

The priest was tried on the other allegations and was acquitted in 2003.

But the Church insists Father Quinn remains suspended from ministry as a priest.

"Cardinal Brady has forbidden Father Quinn from wearing clerical attire."

'Bad bunch'

"(Cardinal Brady) should have been more upfront and more honest, saying as a matter of fact, you know what, there is another case that I've been involved in, in some ways," the victim, whose identity is known to UTV, said.

"If he's hidden what happened in 1975 and if he's hidden what's happened now, what else has actually been hidden?"

However, the victim said Cardinal Brady has been proactive in trying to move things forward over the last few months.

"I don't see any advantage for him to resign. He has proven to me over the last few months that he has taken some actions and perhaps he is the best person to move things forward.

"Who would replace him? He is the best of a bad bunch."

The founder of the victims group 'One in Four', Colm O'Gorman, told UTV the latest revelations raise a number of questions which Cardinal Brady needs to answer.

"He needs to explain why the confidentiality was necessary in the settlement of this case.

"More importantly, he may need to explain when he and the diocese became aware of the allegations against this individual priest; what their actions were; when and if the priest was removed from ministry and why the priest today appears to be still in a position where he plays a role in the community.

"Fine words just won't cut it anymore," Mr O'Gorman told UTV Live.

The Standards and Guidance document for the Catholic Church in Ireland, which was published last year, states that claims should be immediately passed to the relevant authorities and confidentiality cannot be assured either for the perpetrators of child abuse or the survivors.

Some of the most notorious abuse cases which have rocked the Catholic Church have taken place in Northern Ireland.

The Health Minister Michael McGimpsey has said an inquiry into child sex abuse in the region is now one of the options being considered at Stormont.

Mr McGimpsey told UTV the matter must be dealt with as a matter of urgency.

"It's important to say it's not just simply about clerical abuse it's about historical abuse, it's about abuse right across the board. That's what I have been looking at with my officials," Mr McGimpsey said.

"I will bring recommendations and options forward to the Executive in the near future.

"An inquiry is certainly one of the options we are looking at."

© UTV News

Send to a friend

Email To
Your Name
Comment
Close
At 17:31 on 25 March 2010, Mary. Co. Tyrone wrote:
I know Fr. Quinn and his family extremely well. True he has been seen out and about in his clerical attire on various occassions and indeed has continued to carry out some of what was his priestly duties and true questions have to be answered, but all I ask is this, What happened to innocent til proven guilty ? Fr. Quinn has already been brought to trial and acquitted over a false accusation in 2001. This latest faisco which apparently also took place and was made known in 2001, never even made it to the court doors at that time as, the DPP reached the conclusion that Fr. Quinn had no case to answer ! Now have I missed something or was new evidence presented to substaniate this latest saga ?
At 23:50 on 22 March 2010, N. Ni Giolla Chomhaill wrote:
i dont know when the police interviewed him in 2001 but if it was before july 17th then he wasnt even suspended then because he presided over my sisters wedding on the 17th july 2001 !!! He was always my favourite priest im getting married in two years and planned to have him do my wedding because how were we to know that he's supposedly suspended when there are no signs to indicate this!!
At 19:45 on 19 March 2010, patrick mulcahy wrote:
This letter that will be read out from the pope at all mass's on sunday should say. All priests that have in any way harmed children should be arresseted, and sent to jail for a very long time.
At 07:50 on 19 March 2010, T J McClean wrote:
One disaster after another with new revelations every day. The Catholic church needs a root and branch clear out to maintain any credibility.
At 20:56 on 18 March 2010, aoife mccionnaith wrote:
I met him a couple of years ago, having previously met him before, he again had his collar on and said he was working for the cardinal in Armagh!
At 20:01 on 18 March 2010, Dave wrote:
From what has been reported on the news tonight, are Sean Brady and Seamus Hegarty condoning Paedophilia? They have the nerve to come out with their fake apologises on TV and at Mass knowing fine well that they both have been involved in cover ups regarding the abuses to young children. How they can defend Paedophiles is beyond belief. Messers Brady and Hegarty, YOU ARE NO BETTER THAN THE PAEDOPHILES WHO COMMITED THESE CRIMES IN THE FIRST PLACE!!
At 19:20 on 18 March 2010, charles wrote:
is it not now abundantly clear to even the simplest of minds, that cardinal brady and the church he represents is corrupted to the very foundations and additionally the same corrupted individuals and churches are entirely and comprehensively devoid of either shame or the tiniest shred of common decency. The cover up is equally as evil as the acts of the abusers.
Post a comment
Name:
Email Address:
Location:
Your Comment:
Verification Code: Captcha Code  Get New Code
POST COMMENT
[Before posting, please take a moment to familiarise yourself with our house rules. All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Any information you enter, including email and web addresses, will be displayed on our site if passed by our moderators.]