Assembly backs Welfare Reform Bill

Published Wednesday, 10 October 2012
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

Members of the Northern Ireland Assembly have voted in favour of the Welfare Reform Bill, following a marathon debate at Stormont.

Assembly backs Welfare Reform Bill
Parliament Buildings at Stormont (© Getty)

The second stage of the bill - which proposes the most radical changes to the benefits system in NI in years - was passed by 60 votes to 42 late on Tuesday night.

It faced strong opposition from Sinn Féin, who wanted to defer introducing the measures to allow for further talks with Westminister.

The party put forward an amendment calling for a deferral. It was also defeated by 60 votes to 42, before the legislation went through to committee stage by the same margin.

If enacted, the new bill - which has already been passed in England and Wales - will have an impact on the lives of thousands of local people.

Key features include a universal credit to cover a range of benefits, a personal independence payment reassessed every three years to replace Disability Living Allowance, and housing benefit reforms.

The Stormont debate started on Tuesday morning and ended after midnight on Wednesday as all parties raised concerns but clashed over how to achieve changes.

The DUP warned that a failure to adopt the reforms could see the Executive lose out on over £200m of Treasury funding - insisting there is simply no time for deferral.

Sinn Féin did not opt to lodge a Petition of Concern, which would have meant the legislation could only be approved if a majority of unionist and nationalist members back it.

With the party holding sway on the nationalist benches, and the SDLP also willing to sign a petition, it would have guaranteed the fall of the Bill.

However Alex Maskey insisted his party did not want to scrap the legislation but instead renegotiate its terms.

The Ulster Unionists and Alliance also had issues with the bill but said they would not block the legislation passing to committee stage.

© UTV News
Comments Comments
8 Comments
Natalie in Co Down wrote (219 days ago):
I am on jobseekers. I apply for several jobs a week to get off it because I can't even afford to buy myself new underwear on it. Out of the jobs I apply for I very rarely hear anything back from the employer. It's very disheartening. If you go to the job centre website there is 1631 jobs. No way enough for jobseekers in Northern Ireland. When I left foster care I was given a 2 bedroom flat. I worked in McDonalds and other jobs I hated to pay my bills. Now I am less fortunate. They are changing housing benefit. Now because I was given a 2 bedroom flat I could lose my home cause I can't afford to feed myself nevermind pay their penalties. I agree with the changes but realistically the housing executive, private landlards and housing associations do not have enough properties to rehome everyone to suitable accomodation. Also as victim of domestic violence even if I could get a 1 bedroom flat. I am scared to move. Where I live is my only comfort. I have severe depression, I have problems with my tailbone due to my abuse, I have chronic asthma and many other health problems. I could go claim DLA but I want to work but I feel like the government is punishing me.. Comments saying "Take of the greedy and give to the needy?" I don't think so...
David in BELFAST wrote (221 days ago):
When a system is designed in such a way that those who are claiming benefits GET OVERALL MORE MONEY than those who are working for a living then there is something seriously wrong, which is why I'm totally in favour of the radical changes to the welfare system that the government is proposing. It couldn't come soon enough. It will weed out the greedy and only give to the needy.
Stephen in Portadown wrote (221 days ago):
Thank goodness for that! Why should people who dont work be better off than my wife and I who both work full time trying to keep our house and bills paid and provide a future for our daughter? We'd love another child but unfortunately finances just wont allow it at this stage. Yet I don't see unemployed households having the same problems! Now granted not every unemployed person or DLA household is the same and I'm sure the vast majority are genuine cases but at least now those who have been milking the system will have to try a little harder to fund their lifestyles. And no matter how much people want to complain about this, genuinely sick people who can't work have nothing to fear. Its the people who for one reason or another have fallen into the victim mentality that because they were able to get DLA for one reason or another that means they can never ever do a days work the rest of their lives. This is LONG overdue!
rab in newtownabbey wrote (221 days ago):
i for one am glad these reforms are being introduced.its been a long time coming.
PAT M in OMAGH wrote (221 days ago):
IM ON JOBSEEKERS MYSELF AT THE MINUTE, BUT I AGREE THE SYSTEM NEEDS TO CHANGE. THERE IS ALOT OF ABUSE WITH THE DLA. THERE IS PEOPLE ON IT, WHO ARE FITTER THAN I AM, AND THE MONEY IS THAT GOOD, WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO WORK. LONG OVERDUE
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
UVF centenary parade
Sat 20 April 2013
BGT auditions - Week 2
Sat 20 April 2013