Alliance votes for same sex civil marriage

Published Saturday, 01 September 2012
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

The Alliance Party has voted in favour of introducing same sex civil marriage in Northern Ireland.

Alliance votes for same sex civil marriage
David Ford, Alliance Party leader, made the announcement on Saturday. (© UTV)

On Saturday, the party announced that after months of consultation with members and associations a motion was passed by the Alliance ruling council calling for equal civil marriage with robust protection for faith groups.

Party leader David Ford says the political group has "always stood for a progressive and equal society."

He said that the party "will oppose any form of discrimination, whether it is based on age, race, disability, gender or sexual orientation."

"There are equality issues in allowing those in a same sex relationship to have only civil partnerships, which is seen as discriminatory. The motion also called for protection for faith groups, to ensure they are not forced to act contrary to their beliefs.

"I would like to thank our Deputy Leader, Naomi Long who led this process and spent a considerable amount of time and energy in ensuring that we had the correct policy in place on this issue."

Ms Long said that she believed the decision was correct.

"For me as a Christian and a liberal, I believe that equality and religious freedom are fundamental to a democratic society and both must be promoted and protected. I believe our motion reflects that reality.

The East Belfast MP added: "I acknowledge that there are still those who do not in conscience support same sex civil marriage, which is why our policy did provide robust protection for faith groups so they will not be forced to conduct same sex marriage ceremonies or to have them conducted on their premises."

© UTV News
Comments Comments
5 Comments
Laura in Antrim wrote (261 days ago):
There are no legal differences between "marriage" and "civil partnership", therefore the argument that gay people "deserve the same legal recognition" is flawed. Someone within a civil partnership has exactly the same rights as those who are "married". Why then, do gay people need to fight for this to prove their undying love for each other? It is political correctness gone mad. Marriage is a religious ceremony, the religious equivalent to civil partnerships. I am not against gay people or their desire to be a civil partnership, but please leave the religious sacrament of marriage alone.
Frosty in Here wrote (261 days ago):
Love is a rare commodity in this world. If two people find it together, happy days. Hopefully this will provide same sex couples with the same legal rights as a heterosexual couple. No idea why any gay couple would want to get married in a church anyway, talk about sucking up to the opposition. Church weddings in general are a waste of money. A big show for nothing that has a 75% chance in ending in divorece/separation anyway. If God is everywhere, He's in a registry office too.
david in tyrone wrote (262 days ago):
seems every party is trying to out-DUP the DUP!! Ken Maginnis for First Minister!!
Really? in Manchester wrote (263 days ago):
Progressive society? If, like, an obscure journalist who had his first TV show canned, you're referring to England, let's consider that that society had a recreational riot that involved more than 5 major cities. Yet we always get these patronising caveats from journalists about how much they love Northern Irish people. Also, think about the fact that in Canada, saying that marriage should be between a man and a woman is considered "hate speech". The liberal mafia crowd are now telling people what to think, do and say and dress it up as "freedom ". Consider also that sex is a part of marriage, yet the gay marriage supporters want to obviate it from the debate. Think about it (while you're still allowed to).
Ryan in Belfast wrote (263 days ago):
Im in favour of Civil partnerships for gay people but im not in favour of gay marriage. And yes, i do have gay friends and family members, i have no problem with their sexuality but i dont think homosexuality should be expressed as a "norm" for society as a whole, especially to children. Thats my opinion.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]
MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
On the rocks
Wed 01 May 2013
4x4 in Ballycastle harbour
Thu 02 May 2013