Adele's son wins privacy damages

Published Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Comments
Toggle font size
Print

The two-year-old son of singer Adele has accepted a five-figure sum in damages in settlement of a privacy case brought by his parents over paparazzi photos of his "milestone moments".

Adele's son wins privacy damages
BRIT and Grammy Award winning singer Adele. (© Getty)

Lawyers for Adele, who launched the proceedings with her partner Simon Konecki, said she was emphatic that Angelo Adkins was not and must never be "public property".

"It is a matter of profound sadness that many of his milestone moments, such as his first family outing and his first trip to playgroup, were photographed and published worldwide expressly against his family's wishes. Adele and Simon never encourage such photos. Quite the opposite", solicitor Jenny Afia told Mr Justice Bean in court on Wednesday.

Corbis Images UK Limited had offered to pay damages and legal costs to Angelo and agreed not to use the photos at issue again, she added.

The action concerned certain photos of Angelo with Adele, which the photographic agency made available for publication in the English press.

"The parents' view is that these images were of routine, everyday family occasions which the paparazzi has no right to intrude upon, profit from and file away in picture libraries for future reference and use."

Ms Afia added: "Adele and Simon are pleased this matter has been resolved. They continue to do all they can to protect Angelo's rights in relation to the paparazzi, including taking legal action where necessary.

"They will be holding the damages on trust on behalf of the claimant for this purpose. They will also continue efforts to improve the laws relating to paparazzi and children generally, building on the successful campaign Adele helped fund in California resulting in far stricter harassment laws."

Ms Afia said later: "Being in the public eye doesn't mean your children are public property. Our laws provide full protection against the paparazzi and more parents should make use of them.

"The children of famous parents are not celebrities. The law can, will and should protect them."

© UTV News
Comments Comments
0 Comments
No comments. Be the first to comment.
POST A COMMENT:
Name:  
Email address*:    
Location:  
Validation:
House Rules:  
Your Comment:  
[All comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. Your name, location and comment will be displayed on this page if your post passes moderation.]

Watch the best on UTV

UTV main logo
Gino's Italian Escape
19 September - 11:10 pm

Gino's Italian Escape

Gino D'Acampo explores the region of Emilia-R...

Paul O'Grady - For the Love of Dogs
19 September - 10:40 pm

Paul O'Grady - For the Love of Dogs

Paul O'Grady's series continues. The staff tr...

MOST POPULAR GALLERIES
Ian Paisley in pictures
Fri 12 September 2014
Tributes to Gerry Anderson
Thu 21 August 2014
Frampton crowned world champion
Sun 07 September 2014